🔗 Share this article

A Danish citizen has been convicted of sharing nude scenes from copyrighted films and television shows on the social media site Reddit.

Based on a law enforcement document reviewed by media outlets, the anonymous individual shared 347 clips of nude scenes in a Reddit group he managed, which were then watched 4.2 million-plus times.

The country's authorities confirm he has been handed a seven-month suspended jail term for copyright infringement.

Legal analysts explain the defendant was prosecuted under a seldom-invoked clause in Denmark's copyright law, with the judge finding that by taking the footage out of their original context, the man had harmed the artists' "moral rights".

He has additionally been convicted of distributing more than 25 TB of copyrighted data.

From spring 2022 to mid-2023, the user using the alias "KlammereFyr" on Reddit posted sexually explicit clips including over 100 female performers.

He distributed them in the subreddit he was a moderator of.

Per the Denmark's copyright protection group the Rights Alliance, his subreddit had more than 6,000 subscribers and users were encouraged to ask for excerpts of particular actors.

In 2023, campaigners filed the incident to the authorities on behalf of the impacted actors, directors and producers, which led to the subreddit being closed down.

One actress, among the actresses whose explicit scenes were shared in the group, explained to local media at the time she felt there was a distinction between appearing naked in a film and appearing on Reddit.

The actress stated the uploads amounted to "abuse".

'An important signal'

The man was detained in fall 2024 and pleaded culpable to the charges recently.

In a statement after the ruling, the head of the Rights Alliance the organization's leader said the decision sent an "significant" message "that infringements of creators' rights have repercussions".

The ruling is considered unique in the country for its application of the "moral rights" clause of the Danish Copyright Act, which states an creator's creation cannot be used in a way which infringes upon their reputation.

Intellectual property specialist a legal scholar told BBC News the case was "unusual" for its focus on the damage to the dignity of an performer, rather than to them economically.

How the case could influence other countries is uncertain.

But she said there may be "an increasing number of these actions" in the coming years with the advancement of AI, where "the sanctity of one's work might be tempered with much more easily".