🔗 Share this article

In a notable legal reversal, the Australian classification review board has overturned a prior decision that blocked Australian-based users from seeing recorded content of the shooting incident involving influencer Charlie Kirk. The appeal was lodged by Elon Musk's social media platform, which contested an order sought by the national eSafety commissioner.

Background on the Case and Classification Ruling

After the fatal shooting of Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University in last year, the eSafety commissioner applied to the classification board to assess and rate the available footage. It initially ruled the content was "unable to be classified", a designation that empowered the regulator to order social media companies to restrict access to the videos for an Australian audience.

The platform X filed an appeal for two separate videos related to the Kirk incident. Additionally, it contested a similar ruling on a separate video—showing the assault of Iryna Zarutska on a North Carolina train—which had also been deemed "unacceptable for distribution".

The Platform's Case and Final Ruling

In its appeal, X contended that the footage in question contained only a short moment of violence with no visible weapon. The company noted the footage was grainy and the camera quickly panned away from the individual to the bystanders.

The social media giant maintained the footage was not excessively detailed, exploitative, or objectionable, adding that it served as a factual documentation of "a significant incident of historical and political significance that prompted widespread discussion". The platform even compared the video and the well-known recording of President John F. Kennedy's assassination.

Most members of the classification panel concluded that, "despite the terrible nature of the event," the video did not reach a level that was gratuitous, exploitative or offensive enough to warrant a 'refused classification' rating. However, they noted that a more detailed depiction with different editing could have resulted in a different ruling. Consequently, the panel changed the classification of the content to R18+.

The Minority Opinion

Some on the panel disagreed, contending the video was "a shareable video for the probable aim of entertainment and/or personal gain (such as engagement metrics)". This view stated the comparison to the JFK assassination tape was invalid, as the Kennedy video was made public years after the event, "after public sentiment regarding it had calmed".

Response Following the Outcome

Posting on its official policy channel, X welcomed the ruling.

"X fought this case to uphold freedom of expression and the importance of access to information about matters of public significance. Our commitment remains dedicated to safeguarding these fundamental values."

A spokesperson for the eSafety commissioner also welcomed the ruling, but noted that the revised classification now means platforms "must take steps to ensure R18+ material being displayed to users who are minors".

Recent Developments on Sensitive Footage

In related news, the eSafety commissioner did not issue take-down orders to platforms this week regarding graphic footage from the recent Bondi beach terror attack circulating on social media. Officials commented that while the images were distressing, they had not met the required standard for a "refused classification" rating.

Instead, the companies have been advised to use sensitive content labels and screens, such as blurring, on this material in accordance with their existing community guidelines.